My tale of me - Chris Jenkinson

I have written the following letter to Student Direct in response to a letter by Justine Hall in the 12th October 2009 edition of Student Direct (unfortunately the letters are not available online).

Dear Student Direct,

In reply to Justine Hall’s letter on 12th October, it is a shame to see the Green party negatively misrepresenting the Liberal Democrats. The truth is, our position on tuition fees is the same as it has always been - higher education should be free for all, and those that benefit most from it (financially speaking) will end up paying more in tax with our fairer and progressive taxation policies.

Justine’s mistaken criticism should instead be targeted at the Labour government - their failed stewardship of the economy under 12 years of Gordon Brown, first warned about years ago by Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrats’ Shadow Chancellor, has meant that it is just simply not possible to fix all the problems Britain is facing immediately.

Abolishing tuition fees is a priority, but first the limited resources left by Labour to the next government should be spent on cutting class sizes to 15 in primary schools, bringing the poorest out of tax altogether, and investing in public transport and energy-efficient homes to help people save money and protect the environment.

Chris Jenkinson
Liberal Democrat member, Masters in Environmental Governance, University of Manchester

This weekend I attended the first-ever NUS conference for postgraduates. It was really about time that postgraduates, both taught and research, got the attention they deserve from NUS. I know many students’ unions will be looking to the new postgraduate committee for leadership on engaging postgraduate students in their unions in all their work - academic representation, societies, events and more.

I am delighted to be the first ever representative of taught postgraduate students on NUS’ national executive council, and I’ll be using this blog (among other ways) of keeping postgraduate students updated on the work of the postgraduate committee and NUS more widely.

Periodic reviews

I have taken part in two periodic reviews since my last report, for the schools of Dentistry and Environment and Development. Both went well, and it was each panel’s feeling that both schools are performing well, with some excellent practice but some improvements still to be made. Before the next meeting I will be reviewing the School of Law, which I will be happy to answer questions on.

Course representatives

I have finished the final set of meetings with course reps by school, where the main topics of discussion were discussing ways to pass on their knowledge to their successors next academic year as representatives, and the best suggestions will be taken forwards. They include a short end-of-year report and including outgoing reps in the course rep training. We also discussed the Union’s support this academic year and ways to improve the support for next academic year.

I held a discussion with two course reps developing some guiding principles for schools to follow regarding student representation, which was productive and these suggestions will be consulted more widely with course representatives, before being taken to the University. My aim for this project is to have these principles adopted by the University, improving the involvement of course representatives and students more generally within discussions of teaching, learning and the student experience.

I met with staff in the University to discuss ways in which the University can help support course representatives, which was a productive meeting and I believe with increased awareness of the Union’s work in this area at an institutional level the course representation system can be more effective in future.

University meetings

I attended my final meeting of Senate in my capacity as Academic Affairs Officer, where the statistics for appeals, complaints and disciplinary hearings were discussed. The figure for international students was disproportionately high, and I took the opportunity to recommend extra support for students who have previously studied in overseas institutions, as they are often not used to the British system of referencing.

I attended teaching and learning meetings for Engineering and Physical Sciences and Humanities, and contributed a student perspective on several issues, particularly anonymous marking, improving feedback, academic advisors and personalised learning.

I attended a meeting of the Exchange Project Board, which is overseeing the upgrade of the email system for students. The system being proposed is a ‘cloud’ system by Microsoft, meaning if the Board decides to do so, Microsoft will host students’ email externally. There are a few particular criteria that I am keen the solution meets, such as data protection and privacy.

I attended, with several course representatives, a session reporting the findings of a survey the School of Social Sciences conducted into teaching and learning, which was useful as it added to the evidence base for many of the improvements I have been arguing for, and in a sufficiently robust way.

I went to the University’s inaugural teaching and learning conference, and attended sessions on novel assessment techniques, academic advisor implementation, peer mentoring, online formative assessment, and curriculum mapping, and contributed my thoughts on them.

Other activity

I chaired the open meeting with the President and Vice-Chancellor, which had a disappointing turn out. I thought the questions were generally excellent and I hope they continue in the future, with more effective communication so students are aware of the event.

I have been continuing to prepare the handover for my successor and work with her to ensure she can be an effective officer from the start of her term in office.

After a long Law School meeting this afternoon I am pleased to report that the earlier decision to reduce the number of lectures by 10, per 20 credit unit, and replace them with ’surgery hours’, has been reversed. The lack of involvement of course representatives in the working group, and the lack of consultation with students more generally was also recognised.

There will be a review of teaching quality in the Law School in the future - as there rightly should be - but it will be less rushed, engaging more people, staff and students. I hope that next year’s law students do take part and contribute critically, in the way that the law course representatives I have known this year have done so since the proposals first became public.

I took the opportunity today to talk to many Heads of School across the University on the importance of involving students in these debates, as partners. Students I have known who have contributed to discussions about improving student support or feedback have made insightful comments which have often led to major changes when those students’ views were listened to properly.

I am very hopeful that there have been major lessons learned from the past few weeks and that students in the future are not consulted in a tokenistic manner but will be an intregral part of future discussions around teaching and learning across the University.

“Dear Tony Lloyd,

As an officer in the University of Manchester Students’ Union, I was shocked at the recent announcement by two-thirds of vice-chancellors, speaking anonymously, calling for an increase in the cap on tuition fees to at least £4000 per year, with some calling for it to be £20,000.

I strongly believe that this would be a very regressive move for Parliament to take, and will put off many people from applying to university. Students already graduate with thousands of pounds of debt, and the National Union of Students have estimated that if fees were to rise to £5,000 per year, students would graduate with upwards of £30,000 of debt, a magnitude of debt which is really only on a par with a mortgage on a house!

I am also disappointed that the vice-chancellors are speaking anonymously on this issue, and are not coming out publicly to ask for funds. I support their argument that higher education is underfunded, with class sizes out of control, underpaid staff and a lack of learning resources, but the solution cannot be to pass on the cost to the students.

I would like a debate on funding for higher education, but its terms of reference cannot just be ‘how much more should students pay’, and it cannot be conducted anonymously.

I urge you to oppose any plans by vice-chancellors to increase the cap on tuition fees or pass on costs to students, and I call on you to push for increased funding, from general taxation, for higher education, which must be a priority for this country in times of economic recession.

Yours sincerely,
Chris Jenkinson”

Please write to your MP about this issue as well. Feel free to use some or all of my letter for inspiration or the financial facts within.

The recent announcement that two-thirds of vice-chancellors across the country are lobbying for an increase in the cap on tuition fees is shocking and regressive. What’s worse is that the vice-chancellors are doing it anonymously. It isn’t just a small increase - it’s at least £4000 a year, with many arguing for £20,000 a year and one in ten demanding the ability to set any level. I don’t understand how more debt for students is going to be good for this country, especially in times of recession - students could be graduating with over £30,000 of debt.

It’s ridiculous that vice-chancellors are hiding behind anonymity and making these kind of statements. I want a debate on higher education funding - I don’t believe that higher education is funded well enough -  but I want it to be open and transparent. I want to discuss why universities don’t receive enough resources to pay their staff a decent salary, or why class sizes are out of control, and why there aren’t enough books in the library. I don’t want it to be restricted to ‘how high should the cap be’, or done in the shadows.

I want a debate - but not this debate.

As a life sciences student at the University of Manchester the way I was assessed in almost all modules I studied was through exams, and only exams. Yesterday, in my capacity as Academic Affairs Officer, I had the opportunity to talk to course representatives from life sciences and one of the topics we spent a fair amount of time on was whether exams are really the right way to test someone’s understanding of the subject matter, and if not, how they as representatives could go about changing the assessment system so they do test understanding.

I’ve already got strong opinions on the issue, so I sat back and enjoyed the discussion, occasionally clarifying some facts or asking some questions. It was significant that no one was that in favour of exams, other than in recognition that other methods of assessment take longer to mark and staff time is limited.

The two preferred methods suggested (though there were others) were more coursework essays spread throughout the semester, and more assessed group work or presentations. Someone made the point that in most careers, when people are asked to research a topic they are unlikely to spend crazy hours close to the deadline frantically cramming and then write a report in two hours without reference to the subject. Others talked about how, upon reflection the day after an exam, they’d already forgotten a fair amount of what they had just revised.

I’d be interested to hear what other students think about exams as a method of assessment. Do they work? What are they for? How would you prefer to be tested on your understanding of a subject?

Course representatives

I have continued work on the course representative conference. The booking form has been open for 4 days at the time of writing and over 60 course representatives have registered, which is an impressive number. I have begun work on my sessions in the course representative conference (the opening session, and education funding), and will organise a meeting to discuss the education funding session in more detail late this week or early next week.

The next round of course rep meetings on a school-by-school basis are coming around very quickly. The dates on our end have been determined and we are currently verifying with schools whether the proposed dates are feasible. These will be quite intensive but are very useful in gathering opinion about educational policy and practice, and talking and getting feedback about the work of the Union.

Review of Undergraduate Education

I have attended a couple of meetings, including the central strategy group, since the last Executive meeting. Current work at a institutional level revolves around curriculum design and reform (a new group I will be sitting on), the Higher Education Achievement Report, and review of the award system for excellence in various fields, academic and non-academic. Work at faculty and school level continues to be improving feedback, implementing academic advisors, and engaging more staff in the review.

Other activity

I was grateful to meet the new Chancellor and give him a tour, with the General Secretary, of the Union. He was very interested in the work we do in many areas including academic representation, societies, and our democratic structures.

I attended the General Assembly and took the opportunity to talk to several members of senior staff about the work I have been doing on the review and bringing to their attention the views of students and the Union on some of the changes.

I attended NUS regional conference and talked to colleagues about shared issues in addition to attending sessions.

I have also worked on some governance reform to the constitution for the election regulations. I talked to almost all sabbatical officers and several part-time officers (unfortunately constrained by the exam period) about the changes and found the feedback immensely helpful.

I have also helped many students with simple and more complicated problems via email, phone, and in the Advice Centre.

Since the 17th December, I have been working on the two key areas of course representatives and the review of undergraduate education, but I have attended a couple of conferences and contributed towards the website and other non-portfolio activities.

Course representatives

I finished the first round of meetings with all course representatives on a school-by-school basis before Christmas. It was a great opportunity to meet and find out what being a course representative, and studying, is like in many different areas of the university. Unfortunately the meeting duration was only one hour and I frequently found myself pushed for time to get enough information on a whole range of subject areas.

Attendance at the meetings varied significantly from school to school. Due to the short amount of turnaround before starting the meetings, I determined meeting times unilaterally, which meant unfortunately there was a short amount of notice and conflicts with academic commitments in some cases. More forward planning is necessary in future to ensure a higher turnout.

Kevin O’Brien, Associate Dean (Teaching and Learning) in the Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, led the sessions with course representatives in the faculty, asking questions about key aspects of being students in the various schools, which I believe was hugely beneficial for all sides. I am encouraging the Associate Deans in the other faculties to take part in similar activities in the next round of course representative meetings.

In addition, a large amount of work is being done into improving the quality of the data about course representatives so a more strategic view in the future can be taken. We are slowly becoming more aware of where the gaps in the data are so they can be filled and we are becoming more aware of the various structures of student representation that exist in the various schools. Being better at record-keeping means that less time can be spent on reinventing the wheel and making the same mistakes in future years and more on better support and more events for course representatives to benefit from.

I have also been planning the first Course Representative Conference, which is occurring on the afternoon of Wednesday, 11th February. I am hoping this will be a success and hope members of the Executive will attend and enjoy the conference as well.

Review of Undergraduate Education

I have attended several meetings regarding the review, in Humanities, Engineering and Physical Sciences, and Medical and Human Sciences, and with the Vice-President (Teaching and Learning), Colin Stirling. I have also been to meetings about the Learning Commons. Progress continues to be made and several changes will be in place for the upcoming semester, particularly around Academic Advisors. Discussions about improving feedback are ongoing and I have asked the course representatives to continue to be vocal on this topic so it does not slip off the agenda.

Other matters

I attended the Executive away day and the Higher Education Conference, hosted by NUS. Both were interesting events (in different ways), covering new areas that will influence the work I do over the next semester. The issue of postgraduate representation and involvement in the Union will be a focus of mine.

I was pleased to notice that several members of university staff are readers of my blog and have started to look into feedback on exams as a result of my blog post on the issue.

I am also pleased at the trial of the 24-hour library, which is going well. It seems more popular than first expected and I will be meeting the head of the library to discuss a way forward after the end of the exam period.

I think Shamir Patel, in his article “An apathetic attitude”, does a disservice to the hard work the several hundred course representatives do across the university. Being a course rep does not lead to infamy with your photo on the front page of Student Direct or many column inches, but it does lead to respect, experience, and most importantly change.

Finding out what students want changing is simple – persuading the people with the purse strings to agree to that change is a lot more complicated. It’s not whinging to sit in meetings, argue with staff and win improvements for students.

Hardworking course reps in the past have won changes to teaching to make it more personal, changes to the feedback we receive on the work we do, and the 24 hour library we’ll have at the next exam period.

I’m proud of the course reps at this university, and students should be too.